Texas seeks to sue 4 battleground states Biden gained over voting insurance policies
By Elise Viebeck and Robert Barnes
In yet one more last-ditch effort to reverse Biden’s victory, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) stated he would ask the Supreme Court to intervene within the normal election over how Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin administered voting through the coronavirus pandemic.
All 4 states have already licensed their election outcomes, and Tuesday marked the “safe harbor” deadline that can privilege these certifications below federal regulation when it comes time for Congress to tally electoral votes.
Legal specialists stated the Texas swimsuit can be extremely uncommon and lift a number of questions.
It was unclear whether or not Texas has standing to carry a retroactive grievance over how different states implement their election statutes. The Constitution says it’s up to particular person states to set the phrases for elections.
It was additionally unclear whether or not the Supreme Court would agree to hear it. While the excessive court docket handles disputes between states, such “original jurisdiction” circumstances are extra possible to contain disputes over water rights or related points.
In his grievance, Paxton accused the 4 states — which Biden gained — of imposing “new rules for the conduct of the 2020 election that were inconsistent with existing state statutes defining what constitutes a lawful vote.” The submitting additionally rehashed debunked claims of fraud and wrongdoing by election officers which have already been dismissed by judges across the nation. The Trump marketing campaign and its allies have amassed a nearly unbroken document of almost 50 losses in court docket in post-election litigation.
Texas Solicitor General Kyle Hawkins, who usually recordsdata the state’s briefs at the Supreme Court, was not listed among the many legal professionals representing the state.
Steve Vladeck, a constitutional regulation professor at the University of Texas, tweeted: “It looks like we have a new leader in the ‘craziest lawsuit filed to purportedly challenge the election’ category.”
Rick Hasen, an election regulation skilled at the University of California at Irvine, referred to as the submitting a “news release masquerading as a lawsuit” in a blog post that outlined his view of why the motion wouldn’t succeed.
“What utter garbage,” Hasen wrote. “Dangerous garbage, but garbage.”