President-elect Joe Biden is reportedly set to choose Tom Vilsack as the subsequent secretary of agriculture, permitting his longtime buddy to return to the identical job he held for all eight years of President Barack Obama’s administration.
Vilsack’s nomination comes with deep reservations from some Biden allies within the civil rights neighborhood who have been hoping he would select Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio). The president-elect is as a substitute set to faucet her to steer the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Derrick Johnston, president and CEO of the NAACP, mentioned Vilsack was simply one in every of two individuals his group was absolutely opposed to turning into a part of Biden’s Cabinet. (The different was former Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who has been a rumored choose for transportation secretary.)
Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.), a detailed Biden ally, publicly championed Fudge and criticized Vilsack.
“I don’t know why we’ve got to be recycling,” Clyburn mentioned in a New York Times interview final month. “There’s a strong feeling that Black farmers didn’t get a fair shake” below Vilsack, he added.
Fudge, who’s on the House Agriculture Committee, made clear she wished the agriculture publish. She leads the diet and oversight subcommittee and is called a fierce advocate for food assistance packages, which make up the majority of the division’s work.
During a name with civil rights leaders Tuesday night, Biden provided a “spirited defense” of his ally when members expressed concern about Vilsack’s file.
Hanging over Vilsack’s tenure is his therapy of Shirley Sherrod, a Black USDA worker who was fired and nationally humiliated after Vilsack and different Obama administration officers fell for a conservative group’s distorted video making it seem to be she was racist.
“For many people, the first name that comes to mind is Sherrod ― her ouster and the circumstances surrounding her ouster. That looms heavily, and I think it always will for Black people, when his name comes up,” mentioned a civil rights chief who requested anonymity to talk candidly.
In 2010, right-wing blogger Andrew Breitbart posted video of Sherrod purportedly bragging about refusing to assist a white farmer. At the time, Sherrod was the agricultural growth director for the agriculture division in Georgia.
The video was closely and dishonestly edited. The full model of her speech confirmed that it was a consciousness-raising story about overcoming racial biases and the way she did assist the white farm couple (which in addition they confirmed).
Yet Vilsack as a substitute shortly lambasted Sherrod and compelled her resignation with out getting the complete story. The incident was an embarrassing stain on the Obama administration.
“There is zero tolerance for discrimination at USDA, and I strongly condemn any act of discrimination against any person,” Vilsack mentioned on the time. “We have been working hard through the past 18 months to reverse the checkered civil rights history at the department and take the issue of fairness and equality very seriously.”
He later provided a profuse apology ― taking full accountability for Sherrod’s firing ― and provided her a job again on the USDA.
“I’ve learned a lot of lessons from this experience in the last couple of days. And one of the lessons I learned is that these types of decisions require time. I didn’t take the time. I should have,” he mentioned. “And as a result, a good woman has gone through a very difficult period. And I’ll have to live with that for a long, long time.”
“It was an early incident of caving in to false right-wing disinformation and sacrificing Black public servants to attempt to appease them,” mentioned Shawn Sebastian, an activist and Iowan who focuses on progressive rural organizing.
“In the context of Joe Biden winning this election because of Black voters, in the context of an ongoing Georgia Senate campaign that is going to determine governing power, where there are many Black rural voters in the Blackbelt, it’s an extremely controversial and risky choice to reappoint Vilsack against the wishes of Rep. Clyburn and against the wishes of the NAACP,” Sebastian added.
Even other than the Sherrod incident, there was frustration within the Black neighborhood that Vilsack and his division didn’t do extra to assist Black farmers.
The Counter, a publication that focuses on meals coverage, did an investigation in 2019 that discovered that below Vilsack, USDA staff “foreclosed on black farmers with outstanding discrimination complaints,” “threw out new complaints and misrepresented their frequency,” “sent a lower share of loan dollars to black farmers than it had under President Bush” and “failed to adequately compensate black farmers” in a class-action discrimination go well with in opposition to the division introduced by Black farmers.
Vilsack didn’t return a request for remark.
John Boyd, president and founding father of the National Black Farmers Association, mentioned that whereas Vilsack is definitely going to be an enchancment over the present secretary, Sonny Perdue, he might want to do greater than he did throughout the Obama years.
“[W]hile Black farmers had legislative successes during the Obama Administration, far too little was done during his tenure to address the long legacy of discrimination against Black farmers. Doors continue to be closed to many Black farmers and today our members face enormous challenges – including a system that disproportionally leaves them behind,” he mentioned in an announcement.
“It would be incredibly important that if Vilsack is indeed the pick and is confirmed for this critical role that he is immediately surrounded by people who bring life experiences and a racial justice lens to the work,” added Kristen Clarke, president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, who was on the decision with Biden on Tuesday night time.
It’s an especially controversial and dangerous option to reappoint Vilsack in opposition to the needs of Rep. Clyburn and in opposition to the needs of the NAACP.
Shawn Sebastian, activist and Iowan centered on progressive rural organizing
Vilsack and Biden have long been close. The former governor of Iowa and his spouse have been early supporters of Biden in his first run for president and once more in his most up-to-date marketing campaign. Vilsack is a standard choose for the job ― a white man from an overwhelmingly white agricultural state.
Democrats have more and more been performing poorly in rural areas in comparison with Republicans, and Vilsack is taken into account to be somebody who may also help attain out to rural America.
But some progressive activists say Vilsack is precisely what’s mistaken with Democratic outreach in these areas.
“Tom Vilsack presided over economic distress and Democratic Party decline in rural areas,” mentioned Jeff Hauser, founding father of the Revolving Door Project, which focuses on presidential personnel. “Big Agriculture got even bigger as Obama and Vilsack broke a series of commitments to anti-monopoly initiatives that Obama had made in the course of his historic Iowa caucus victory. What about that record is making Biden think the next four years at the Department of Agriculture cannot perform any better than under Vilsack from 2009-17?”
There has been only one Black secretary of agriculture ― Mike Espy, who served below President Bill Clinton.
Just final month in an interview with Politico, Fudge criticized presidents for relegating Black leaders to sure companies, together with the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
“As this country becomes more and more diverse, we’re going to have to stop looking at only certain agencies as those that people like me fit in,” she mentioned. “You know, it’s always ‘We want to put the Black person in Labor or HUD.’”
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to turn into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter