WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump on Wednesday requested the Supreme Court to let him be a part of an inconceivable lawsuit difficult election ends in Pennsylvania and different states that he misplaced, a day after the justices rejected a last-gasp bid to reverse Pennsylvania’s certification of Democrat Joe Biden’s victory.
The excessive courtroom has requested for responses by Thursday. Out of the roughly 50 lawsuits filed across the nation contesting the Nov. 3 vote, Trump has misplaced greater than 35 and the others are pending, based on an Associated Press tally.
The go well with from the Texas lawyer normal, Republican Ken Paxton, calls for that the 62 whole Electoral College votes in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin be invalidated. That’s sufficient, if put aside, to swing the election to Trump. Paxton’s go well with repeats a litany of false, disproven and unsupported allegations about mail-in ballots and voting within the 4 battlegrounds.
Repeating a lot of these claims, Trump lawyer John Eastman wrote, “The fact that nearly half of the country believes the election was stolen should come as no surprise.” Biden gained by greater than 7 million votes and has a 306-232 electoral vote edge.
“We will be INTERVENING in the Texas (plus many other states) case,” Trump mentioned hours earlier than the excessive courtroom submitting. “This is the big one. Our Country needs a victory!”
Legal specialists dismissed Paxton’s submitting as the most recent and maybe longest authorized shot since Election Day, and officers within the 4 states sharply criticized Paxton.
“I feel sorry for Texans that their tax dollars are being wasted on such a genuinely embarrassing lawsuit,” Wisconsin’s lawyer normal, Josh Kaul, mentioned.
Seventeen states Trump gained final month joined Texas in urging the courtroom to tackle the lawsuit lower than per week earlier than presidential electors collect in state capitals to formally select Biden as the subsequent president.
They are: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and West Virginia.
The Supreme Court, with out remark Tuesday, refused to name into query the certification course of in Pennsylvania. Gov. Tom Wolf, D-Pa., already has licensed Biden’s victory and the state’s 20 electors are to fulfill on Dec. 14 to solid their votes for the previous vice chairman.
In any case, Biden gained 306 electoral votes, so even when Pennsylvania’s outcomes had been doubtful, he nonetheless would have greater than the 270 electoral votes wanted to change into president.
Shortly earlier than tweeting about becoming a member of Paxton’s case, Trump distanced himself from the Pennsylvania problem, saying it wasn’t his. “The case everyone has been waiting for is the State’s case with Texas and numerous others joining,” he mentioned.
The courtroom’s determination to not intervene in Pennsylvania got here in a go well with led by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., and GOP congressional candidate and Trump favourite Sean Parnell, who misplaced to Rep. Conor Lamb, D-Pa.
“Even Trump appointees & Republicans saw this for what it was: a charade,” Lamb mentioned on Twitter.
In courtroom filings, legal professionals for Pennsylvania and Wolf, mentioned the go well with’s claims have been “fundamentally frivolous” and its request “one of the most dramatic, disruptive invocations of judicial power in the history of the Republic.”
“No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor’s certification of presidential election results,” they wrote.
Having misplaced the request for the courtroom to intervene instantly, Greg Teufel, a lawyer for Kelly and Parnell, mentioned he would request that the courtroom contemplate the case on its underlying deserves on an expedited foundation.
Still, hopes for rapid intervention regarding the election “substantially dimmed” with the courtroom’s motion Tuesday, Teufel mentioned.
In their underlying go well with, Kelly, Parnell and the opposite Republican plaintiffs had sought to both throw out the two.5 million mail-in ballots submitted beneath the regulation or to wipe out the election outcomes and direct the state’s Republican-controlled Legislature to choose Pennsylvania’s presidential electors.
The Republicans argued that Pennsylvania’s expansive vote-by-mail regulation is unconstitutional as a result of it required a constitutional modification to authorize its provisions. Just one Republican state lawmaker voted towards its passage final yr within the Republican-controlled Legislature.
Biden beat Trump by greater than 80,000 votes in Pennsylvania, a state Trump had gained in 2016. Most mail-in ballots have been submitted by Democrats.
Levy reported from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Associated Press author Nomaan Merchant in Houston contributed to this report.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to change into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter