Other lawmakers, together with some Republicans, have argued that the pandemic aid package deal ought to be scaled down, with objects just like the minimal wage provision left for one other legislative battle later in the 12 months. Most House Republicans voted in opposition to a stand-alone minimal wage invoice in 2019, pointing to a Congressional Budget Office report that estimated the availability would put an estimated 1.3 million Americans out of labor. Senate Republicans, in management of the chamber, didn’t take it up.
“That’s an agenda item for the administration, so be it,” Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, advised reporters. “Should it be included as part of a Covid relief package? I think it takes the focus off the priority, which is what is the immediate need today.”
“Hey,” she added, “you get the keys to the car now. And so let’s get some legislation done, but you don’t need to think that you need to get it all in one package.”
Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, bluntly advised reporters in January that “we’re not going to do a $15 minimum wage in it” and that Mr. Biden was higher off reaching out to Capitol Hill and negotiating a compromise.
Mr. Sanders and Democrats have argued that with jobless advantages set to start expiring in mid-March, there’s little time to win over their Republican counterparts, who launched into comparable reconciliation efforts in 2017 to repeal parts of the Affordable Care Act and cross a sweeping tax overhaul.
But to safe the primary improve in the federal minimal wage since 2009, even below reconciliation Mr. Sanders and liberal Democrats can afford to lose little, if any, help from the remainder of the caucus.
Several lawmakers, together with Representative John Yarmuth of Kentucky, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, have voiced skepticism that the minimal wage provision can prevail by the foundations of the reconciliation course of, which imposes strict parameters to stop the method from being abused. Under the so-called Byrd Rule, Democrats can’t embrace any measure that impacts the Social Security program, will increase the deficit after a sure time frame set in the finances decision or doesn’t change revenues or spending.