“He summoned a mob to Washington, exhorted them into a frenzy, and aimed them like a loaded cannon down Pennsylvania Avenue,” the managers wrote.
Unlike the primary impeachment case in opposition to Mr. Trump, which centered on his stress marketing campaign on Ukraine, this one has bipartisan assist and the prosecutors seem poised to make frequent use of Republicans’ personal criticisms of Mr. Trump. Their temporary quoted Representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming, one among 10 House Republicans who voted to question, in addition to Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority chief, who stated publicly that Mr. Trump “provoked” the mob.
In making constitutional arguments in favor of Mr. Trump’s conviction, although, they reached lots of of years additional again, arguing that Mr. Trump had not solely prompted violence however threatened the custom of the peaceable switch of energy begun by Washington. They additionally cited debates by the founders about who can be topic to impeachment and when, in addition to a Nineteenth-century impeachment trial of a former conflict secretary, to say that the Senate clearly had a proper to strive Mr. Trump even after he left workplace.
“There is no ‘January exception’ to impeachment or any other provision of the Constitution,” the managers wrote. “A president must answer comprehensively for his conduct in office from his first day in office through his last.”
They additionally insisted that the First Amendment proper to free speech couldn’t defend Mr. Trump from accountability for inciting violence that might search to do hurt to the Constitution, undermining all of the rights enshrined there, together with free speech.
The president’s submitting was narrower by design, with a lengthier, extra detailed temporary due from his legal professionals early subsequent week. Still, the contours of their protection have been changing into clear.
The legal professionals stated Democrats had misinterpreted Mr. Trump’s actions and his intent, denying that he was accountable for the Capitol riot or that he supposed to intrude with Congress’s formalizing of Mr. Biden’s win. They stated his phrases to supporters on Jan. 6 — “if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore” — weren’t meant as a name to violent motion, however have been “about the need to fight for election security in general.”