As attorneys for former President Donald Trump argued Friday that he must be acquitted at his impeachment trial for his function within the Jan. 6 rebel, one in every of his supporters was in federal courtroom in Georgia asking for his son to be launched from federal custody after the 18-year-old was charged with shoving an officer in the course of the lethal assault on the U.S. Capitol.
Joseph Cua and his spouse took their 18-year-old son, Bruno Cua, to the nation’s capital in January as a result of they ― like thousands and thousands of Americans ― believed the conspiracy theories a few stolen election being floated by the previous president.
On Friday afternoon, Joseph Cua advised a federal Justice of the Peace choose why he thought ― even if he had introduced his son to the scene of the crime and believed within the conspiracies that drove the assault ― he and his spouse could be good custodians of their son till his trial.
Bruno Cua is dealing with a number of federal fees for storming the Capitol on Jan. 6, together with assault on a federal officer, civil dysfunction and obstruction of an official continuing. His dad testified that he knew he son had introduced a baton with him as they went to the Capitol.
“President Trump is calling us to FIGHT!” the youthful Cua posted on the right-wing social media web site Parler beneath the identify @PatriotBruno, in accordance with the feds. “This isn’t a joke, this is where and when we make our stand.”
His father purchased into the lies too, satisfied there was “all this fraud and the election was stolen.” But now, testifying within the hopes of securing his son’s pretrial launch, Joseph Cua mentioned he now acknowledged that the he was mislead.
“I share responsibility in that,” he mentioned. “As a middle-aged man, I feel like I can filter a little bit of that with reality, but I felt like as a teenager, he was drinking it in, and just believed it too much.”
Bruno Cua, his father mentioned, “parroted stuff from other leaders on social media and leaders ― like the president ― or the attorneys like Lin Wood and all these people saying ‘We have all this information and everything’s gonna come out.’”
“I myself feel pretty embarrassed that I think a lot of us felt like this happened and we believed these people and be disillusioned that there was no big reveal, and nothing came out. It’s disillusioning, disheartening and embarrassing, quite frankly,” Joseph Cua mentioned. He added that he was “embarrassed that we drank in a lot of this rhetoric from so-called leaders that just never materialized.”
Cua mentioned it was after the assault on the Capitol, however earlier than his son’s arrest, that he backed away from the mass voter fraud conspiracy theories. Joseph Cua mentioned he had hoped that seeing a large crowd outdoors the Capitol would “bolster” the “courage” and “confidence” of Republican lawmakers to object to the certification of state electoral votes and overturn the election outcomes, which Cua believed have been fraudulent. Now, he mentioned, he realized the reality ― that Joe Biden was the authentic winner of the 2020 election, and that Trump and his enablers have been feeding him and his son a bunch of lies.
“I feel like I maybe should’ve known a little bit better at my age,” Joseph Cua mentioned. “At some point, you’re like, ‘I think this is a bunch of B.S.’”
Joseph Cua mentioned he felt chargeable for bringing his son to the Capitol, and mentioned that he and his spouse would be capable to create a secure atmosphere for him at dwelling.
Ryan Karim Buchanan, a prosecutor for the Justice Department, moved to detain Bruno Cua, saying dwelling wasn’t a “suitable place” for him. “I don’t believe that home incarceration would work because he’s an 18-year-old who’s home schooled,” Buchanan mentioned. The issues that Bruno Cua had ingested, not solely from the web however from his dad and mom, led him to the assault on the Capitol.
“[Joseph] Cua testified that he believes some of this came from him, he acknowledged that he bears some responsibility for his son’s belief structure and then the actions that arose out of those,” Buchanan mentioned. “Absent the internet, absent going to any rallies, his parents are still there.”
“He went up to D.C., his parents went with him, and then he committed multiple felonies there,” Buchanan mentioned. “The idea that this is some type of learning experience for him … the danger he poses has not been mitigated. The danger he poses, I believe, is mitigated with him in custody.”
Chief Magistrate Judge Alan J. Baverman agreed.
Bruno Cua, he dominated, could be held in custody till his trial. He could be despatched again to D.C., the place he’ll face trial for his crimes or, extra probably, take a plea deal.
Baverman mentioned that, outdoors of a drug case, he had has hardly ever seen this a lot household involvement in a criminal offense.
“We have a lot of really serious, a lot of really, really dangerous people who show up here in federal court,” Baverman mentioned. “But I have to say this is the first time in a number of years in a non-family drug case where his parents were, maybe not instigators, but aiders and abettors and didn’t take steps to stop their child from going off the rails.”
Baverman mentioned it was “not very credible” to him that Cua’s father didn’t see the hazard of what was taking place, provided that he noticed the Trump supporters in paramilitary gear, knew his son had a weapon on him, and allowed his son to go up the scaffolding across the Capitol.
“I’ve rejected custodians far less involved in the criminal conduct of the defendant,” Baverman mentioned. “Mr. Cua said they were misled by leaders. Well, Mr. Cua is supposed to be a leader, as a parent.”
Baverman mentioned the assault on the Capitol was an “attempt to overthrow the lawful processes” of the United States authorities.
“And now we’re saying ‘Well, darn, I really didn’t mean any of that.’ But that’s what his mindset what, and his mindset continued after the sixth, when there was no evidence,” Baverman mentioned. “Even when the ex-president said ‘Go peacefully,’ we’re still hearing talk from this defendant of revolution, ‘I want to fight.’”
Baverman mentioned that, based mostly on Cua’s actions each earlier than and after his felony exercise, there have been no circumstances that would moderately guarantee the protection of the group.
“Therefore, I’m detaining Mr. Cua, and I am removing him to the District of Columbia,” Baverman mentioned.
By the time Cua arrives in D.C., dozens of Senate Republicans might have already voted to acquit the previous president of inciting the violence that Cua participated in.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to develop into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter