WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday disposed of the final of three circumstances delivered to the justices by former President Donald Trump difficult his election loss, bringing a muted finish to his futile quest within the court dockets to carry onto energy.
The court docket with out remark rejected Trump’s enchantment difficult 1000’s of absentee ballots filed in Wisconsin, an election battleground that the Republican businessman-turned-politician misplaced to Democrat Joe Biden by greater than 20,000 votes. Biden grew to become president on Jan. 20.
It was the final of three petitions filed on the Supreme Court close to the tip of Trump’s presidency that the justices declined to take up. The court docket on Feb. 22 turned away Trump’s different two appeals — a second Wisconsin problem and one referring to voting in Pennsylvania, one other pivotal state Trump misplaced. Lower court dockets beforehand had dominated in opposition to Trump in these three circumstances.
It already was clear that the excessive court docket, which incorporates three justices appointed by Trump, had no intention to intervene within the circumstances and others filed by his allies as a result of it didn’t act earlier than Congress on Jan. 6 licensed Biden’s victory. That formal certification was interrupted when a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol.
In the Wisconsin case, Trump sued two days after the state had licensed its election outcomes. He challenged a number of Wisconsin election insurance policies together with one permitting the usage of drop containers for absentee ballots in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. Both a federal decide and the Chicago-based seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the claims, noting partly that Trump had waited too lengthy to sue.
Courts across the nation rejected the circumstances introduced by Trump and his allies, typically in colourful phrases. A decide put it this manner in November in rejecting a Trump problem in Pennsylvania: “This claim, like Frankenstein’s Monster, has been haphazardly stitched together.”
Trump has made – and continues to make – false claims that the Nov. 3 presidential election was stolen from him by means of widespread voting fraud and irregularities. Republicans are actually seizing on those self same unsubstantiated allegations in an effort to impose new voting restrictions in quite a few states.
The Supreme Court on Monday additionally turned away one other election-related case filed by Trump ally Lin Wood, who had requested the justices to dam the Jan. 5 Senate runoff elections in Georgia. The court docket by no means acted on the request and Democrats gained each races, giving them slender management of the Senate.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Will Dunham)
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to change into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter