The California Supreme Court issued a serious ruling Thursday figuring out that the state’s unilateral coverage of detaining folks just because they can not afford bail is unconstitutional.
The unanimous decision implies that judges within the state should think about a defendant’s potential to pay after they set bail. If they can not pay, and the choose doesn’t imagine them to pose a menace to society if launched, the choose might not hold them behind bars in pretrial detention.
“Whether an accused person is detained pending trial often does not depend on a careful, individualized determination of the need to protect public safety, but merely ― as one judge observes ― the accused’s ability to post the sum provided in a county’s uniform bail schedule,” Justice Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar wrote within the court docket’s opinion.
“The common practice of conditioning freedom solely on whether an arrestee can afford bail is unconstitutional,” they concluded.
The court docket took on the case after a San Francisco man, Kenneth Humphrey, challenged the $600,000 bail a choose assigned him in 2017 after he was accused of robbing a neighbor of $5 and a bottle of cologne. The theft case has but to be settled.
“I am pleased other people will have the same opportunities I had to change their lives and they will not have to wait in jail for years because they are too poor to pay bail,” he stated in an announcement Thursday via the San Francisco public defender’s workplace.
Public defender Mano Raju known as the choice “historic” and applauded Humphrey for his braveness to problem the system
“Mr. Humphrey’s success while out of custody shows what can happen when we invest in people, not cages, and my office is committed to continuing to push for changes that will result in more fairness and equity for all Californians,” Raju stated in an announcement.
Thursday’s ruling comes 4 months after Californians voted in opposition to a statewide proposition to utterly eradicate money bail. Most vocal criticism of the laws got here from progressive teams that apprehensive the system that may change money bail — utilizing risk-assessment instruments and giving judges extra discretion — may exacerbate racism and different inequities when it comes to who’s held in pretrial detention.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to develop into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter