The House of Representatives handed laws on Wednesday to stop a president from ordering broad bans on journey into the U.S., a focused assault on government authority following former President Donald Trump’s ban on journey from largely Muslim-majority nations.
The chamber voted 218 to 208 in help of the invoice, known as the No Ban Act, with one Republican becoming a member of all House Democrats. If enacted, it might restrict the president’s skill to manage immigration, place any journey bans beneath congressional oversight and mandate that they be non permanent. The invoice would additionally prohibit spiritual discrimination as a part of any immigration selections.
Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.), the sponsor of the laws, mentioned on the ground Wednesday that Trump’s government orders banning sure vacationers had been “always wrong, needless and cruel.”
“Today we can make sure it never happens again,” Chu mentioned. “America does not ban people because of their religion.”
The invoice is unlikely to sail by way of the Senate, the place Democrats maintain a slim majority with 50 seats and Vice President Kamala Harris because the tie-breaking vote.
Trump had long pledged to shut down the entry of Muslims into the United States throughout this 2016 marketing campaign and made good on his promise through the early days of his administration, signing an order for a sweeping ban in opposition to seven Muslim-majority nations in January 2017. Amid a chronic authorized battle, the White House was pressured to amend the ban twice, and the Supreme Court upheld it by a vote of 5-4 in 2018. Eventually the ban included vacationers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Chad, North Korea and Venezuela. A later order put restrictions on residents from Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan and Tanzania.
Critics mentioned the bans amounted to a blatant try to penalize Muslims and was a part of Trump’s broader effort to restrict nearly all immigration into the United States.
President Joe Biden eased these bans in his first days in workplace.
Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, recommended the passage of the laws, saying, if permitted, it might rein in “executive overreach” and protect the ability of Congress to ascertain immigration legal guidelines. He mentioned Trump had “abused” his authority, “twisting it in ways that were never intended.”
“In advancing this legislation today, we uphold our nation’s founding ideals and we reaffirm our commitment to the Rule of Law,” Nadler said in a statement on Wednesday. “Members on both sides of the aisle should agree that no president — Republican or Democratic — should be permitted to usurp the powers of the legislative branch enshrined in the Constitution.”
The White House mentioned earlier this week it supported the No Ban Act, saying the “prior administration’s haphazard misuse of this authority highlights the need for reasonable constraints.”
Biden confronted fierce criticism this month over his resolution to retain a traditionally low restrict of 15,000 on the variety of refugees allowed to enter the U.S. in a yr, a cap set by the Trump administration. Biden had earlier promised to permit greater than 60,000 refugees, and the White House has since walked again the restrictive quantity and mentioned it might announce a new cap by mid-May.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to change into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter