Senate Republicans issued a slew of cataclysmic warnings on Tuesday as they tried to sink voting reform, claiming the Democrats’ top-priority bundle would dismantle religion in democracy and suppress hundreds of thousands of votes ― all as their very own get together pushes voting limitations nationwide.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) known as the invoice “Jim Crow 2.0.”
It’s an absurd comparability: Jim Crow legal guidelines had been geared toward making it near-impossible for Black Americans to vote; Democrats’ invoice (the For the People Act) would make voting simpler, streamline registration processes and stop partisan gerrymandering, amongst different reforms.
“This legislation is profoundly dangerous, and the reason it suppresses millions of votes is by allowing millions of people to vote illegally,” Cruz mentioned throughout a Senate guidelines committee listening to on the invoice. “That is the intended effect and that would be the actual effect of this bill. It dilutes the legal votes of American citizens.”
During a quick hallway interview after Cruz’s feedback, HuffPost identified that Jim Crow-era voting legal guidelines really stopped Black individuals from voting.
“And in this instance the Democrats want to stop the voters from voting Democrats out of power,” Cruz replied.
Republicans plan to spend the listening to providing numerous amendments meant to tank the invoice. Many of the voting reforms Democrats are proposing are popular with the public, which maybe explains why Republicans are greedy at exaggerations, deceptive statements and flat-out lies to push again.
Cruz claimed the invoice is “intended to” register undocumented immigrants to vote ― it doesn’t authorize this ― and meant to profit Democrats. He argued it’s just like Jim Crow legal guidelines in that each had been pushed by Democrats; a press release that ignores the truth that the Democrats of that period had been far completely different than the get together at present. Republicans claimed the invoice is solely a power-grab to take over from native election boards, and that it might create mass voter fraud.
The arguments construct on former President Donald Trump’s lies that the 2020 election was stolen, the 2016 election was rigged and that voting is, on the entire, rife with fraud. His claims helped inspire supporters to storm the Capitol on Jan. 6 and are getting used throughout the nation to push voting restrictions. Now they may assist sink voting reform.
Passage was already a protracted shot: Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) has signaled the bundle have to be bipartisan to win his assist, which means Senate Democrats at present don’t have 50 votes in favor, a lot much less the 60 they’d must bypass a filibuster.
But Democrats have vowed to struggle arduous for the invoice, which they contemplate notably vital given state-level efforts to restrict voting entry.
Republicans mentioned that Democrats are out for their very own profit.
“This legislation is designed to ensure that Democrats never lose another election,” Cruz mentioned, regardless of Republicans selecting up 14 House seats through the highest voter turnout in over 100 years in 2020.
“If this bill were to pass, nobody would have any confidence in [our democracy],” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) mentioned, echoing the manufactured issues about election integrity raised by pro-Trump lawmakers who challenged the 2020 election outcomes. “None whatsoever. Let’s call it what it is. Put aside the flowery language. This is a partisan effort to take over how you conduct elections in our country.”
Republicans argued that choices on voting legal guidelines needs to be left to state and native officers and that the invoice goes too far in implementing nationwide requirements. They additionally argued that it gave an excessive amount of energy to Democrats in its overhaul of the Federal Election Commission, by switching the variety of commissioners from six to 5, which might shift from three members of every get together to 3 from one, two from one other. Critics say the oversight board’s present cut up, which is required by legislation, makes it ineffectual.
Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) mentioned Republicans wish to make it “easier to vote and harder to cheat” however that Democrats’ voting invoice would do the other. HuffPost requested Blunt if he was attempting to indicate there was dishonest within the final election, which he has beforehand mentioned was not rigged.
“It does not imply that, though I am sure there was some cheating in the last election,” he mentioned.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to turn into a founding member and assist form HuffPost’s subsequent chapter